Local government PPP landscape

  • Overview

    local.fig

    Number of SNGs

    • Municipalities
      N/A
    • Intermediate
      N/A
    • Regional/State
      N/A
    • Total Number of SNGs
      N/A

    SNG Expenditure (% of GDP)

    • Total SNG Expenditure
      N/A
    • SNG Current Expenditure
      N/A
    • SNG Staff Expenditure
      N/A
    • SNG Investment
      N/A

    SNG Expenditure (% of govt. expenditure)

    • SNG Expenditure
      N/A
    • SNG Current Expenditure
      N/A
    • SNG Staff Expenditure
      N/A
    • SNG Investment
      N/A

    SNG Revenue (% of GDP)

    • SNG Revenue
      N/A
    • SNG Tax Revenue
      N/A
    • SNG Grants
      N/A
    • Other SNG Revenue
      N/A

    SNG Revenue (% of govt. revenue)

    • SNG Revenue (% of govt. revenue)
      N/A
    • SNG Tax Revenue (% of govt. tax revenue)
      N/A
    • SNG Grants (% of govt. grants)
      N/A
    • Other SNG Revenue (% of other govt. evenue)
      N/A

    SNG Debt Profile

    • SNG Debt (% of GDP)
      N/A
    • SNG Debt (% of govt. debt)
      N/A

    Transfers to SNGs from National Government

    • SNG Transfers Score
      D+
    • Score for Transfer Allocation System
      C
    • Score for Info Transfer Timeliness
      D
    • Score for Collection and Reporting of Fiscal Data
      N/A

    GDP = gross domestic product, N/A = not applicable, SNG = subnational government.

    Sources: International Monetary Fund. 2015. Bangladesh Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment. Washington, DC. https://www.pefa.org/country/bangladesh; and United Cities and Local Governments. 2016. Subnational Governments around the World—Structure and Finance. https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/global_observatory_of_local_finance-part_iii.pdf.

  • Local Governance System in Bangladesh

    Bangladesh is a unitary state and has no provincial or state government within the governance structure. Bangladesh has a two-tier government system. The ministries and divisions at the Secretariat constitute the policy tier, while the other tier is general administration (law and order, land administration, and revenue collection). Delivery of public services and implementation of development programs are carried out at the subnational levels—districts and upazilas (subdistricts) that represent the ministries and divisions.

    There are 7 central government divisions; 11 city corporations; 223 pourashavas (municipalities); 64 district councils (zila parishads); 500 upazila parishads; and 4,451 union parishads.1

    The local government has several tiers and includes a large network of institutions: city corporations and pourashavas at the urban level; zila parishads headed by a deputy commissioner (a deputy secretary appointed by the government from the Administration Cadre); upazila parishads headed by an executive officer; and the lowest tier in the local government subsector, the elected union parishad working at the grassroots level to deliver public services.

    The Local Government Division (LGD) within the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives is responsible for the development and implementation of legislation regulating local government, with the exception of the Hill District Local Government Parishad Act 1989, which is administered by the Ministry of Hill Tracts Affairs. The LGD is undertaking work and implementing programs to attain Vision 2021, the Seventh Five-Year Plan, and the Sustainable Development Goals.2

    Most of Bangladesh’s local governments are highly dependent on a historically centralized national government system. Most of their funding comes from the central government (largely using development aid), and it is not nearly enough. Less than 1% of Bangladesh’s gross domestic product (GDP) funds 85% of local government development expenditures, and local governments generate very little of their own revenue, especially compared to their counterparts in other low-GDP countries.

    The responsibilities and functions of pourashavas are specified in the Local Government (Pourashava) Act, 2009.

  • Infrastructure Development Plan of Local Governments

    The Local Government (Pourashava) Act, 2009 mandates municipal governments to

    • provide all types of urban facilities to citizens of the respective areas in accordance with the Pourashava Act, 2009 and other relevant legislation;
    • establish coordination between pourashava administration and government officials in undertaking programs; and
    • develop infrastructure, and prepare and implement urban development plan, including building control.3

    In line with the above, local governments are responsible for providing all infrastructure, including water and wastewater, solid waste management, health-care-related infrastructure, local road, footpath, and traffic-management-related infrastructure.

  • Sectors in which Local Governments can Implement PPPs

    Services vary across local governments. The main responsibilities of city corporations and municipalities are as follows:

    • water, sanitation, and drainage;
    • refuse collection and disposal;
    • births, deaths, and marriages registration;
    • public health, hospitals, health centers, and medical aid;
    • bathing places, dhobi Ghats (place used for laundry);
    • fisheries, milk processing, and markets;
    • slaughterhouses;
    • animal husbandry, stray animals, farms;
    • building control and regulation, development plans, and community development projects;
    • public streets and traffic control;
    • civil defense, flood and fire services;
    • burial and burning places;
    • arboriculture, gardens, open spaces, and forests;
    • education and libraries;
    • culture fairs and shows; and
    • social welfare.

    The main responsibilities of zila parishads and hill district parishads are as follows:

    • implementing development projects;
    • public libraries;
    • roads, culverts, and bridges not covered by upazila parishads, municipalities, or the national government;
    • gardens, playgrounds, open places, and trees in public areas;
    • ferry ghats not maintained by other levels of government;
    • rest houses and inns;
    • assisting upazila parishads; and
    • implementing the development plan assigned by the national government.

    Discretionary services include

    • education and culture;
    • social and financial welfare; and
    • public health and public works.
  • Revenues for Local Governments

    All local governments have the power to levy taxes and rates. There are no aggregate figures available, but the main sources of local government revenue are as follows:

    • income from taxes, rates, tolls, fees, and other charges;
    • rents and profits from property;
    • grants made by the national government through annual development plan and special allocations;
    • profits from investments; and
    • donations and transfers of private or public funds.

    According to the Local Government (City Corporation) Act, 2009, there are 26 types of revenue sources for city corporations. For example, the funding sources of the Dhaka North City Corporation are internal revenue collection, central government grants, development grants, project development loans, and other loans.4

    • Internal revenue collection

      The power to levy and collect revenues is contained in the Dhaka City Corporation Ordinance, 1983. The revenues are in the form of taxes, rates, and fees whose amounts are established in their respective model tax schedules.

    • Taxes and rates (collectively known as the holding tax)

      This levy is applicable to all properties (domestic, commercial, industrial, and institutional). It is a major source of municipal revenue and is composed of

      • Land and buildings assessment (property tax with a ceiling of 7% on the balance of the annual rental value);
      • Lighting rate (street lighting, rate set at maximum of 3%); and
      • Conservancy rate (a rate for provision of solid waste collection and disposal services, also with a ceiling of 7%).
    • Service elements of holding tax

      These are charged for all properties in areas where each service is provided, irrespective of whether the individual property owner avails of the service. The service elements include the following:

      • Fixed property transfer tax (levied by the central government, 2% of the declared property value is remitted to the city corporation);
      • Octroi compensation grant (grant from the central government to compensate municipalities for the abolition in 1985 of their powers to levy import and export taxes transmitting their territories);
      • Trades and profession license tax (an annual fixed amount paid by tradespeople and professionals as a license fee to conduct their business activities);
      • Entertainment tax (10%–15% of the entrance ticket value for cinemas, theaters, and exhibitions);
      • Rickshaw license (annual fee);
      • Income from residential, market, and other properties (from advance payments and annual rentals paid by lessees for a property developed by the municipalities);
      • Road excavation fees (charged for utilities that lay pipes and cables under roads); and
      • Others (those that generate minimal revenues).
    • Development grants

      These are equity contributions from the central government toward capital project implementation costs. Typically, these are made for the funding of no-cost or indirect cost recovery programs such as roads, flood protection, and drainage, whether from internally generated central government revenues or from external loan or grant proceeds.

    • Project development loans

      For cost-recovery projects, such as land development, sanitation, and solid waste management, the central government extends external loan proceeds under subsidiary loan agreements.

    • Other loans

      The Dhaka North City Corporation has access to domestic long-term loans from government-owned banks.

  • Borrowings by Local Governments

    The Bangladesh Economic Review 2019 reports the outstanding borrowings of the Local Government Division. Table shows the outstanding position of debt service liabilities of the top 15 local governments as of 31 December 2018.5

    Debt Service Liabilities of the Top 15 Local Governments

    Entity Not Due (Tk million) Total Principle Due (Tk million) Total Interest Due (Tk million) Total Due (Tk million) Total Outstanding
    (Tk million) ($ million)
    Chittagong WASA 45,106.22 2,889.49 6,162.98 9,052.47 54,158.68 638.64
    Dhaka WASA 27,173.03 10,081.69 12,775.24 22,856.92 50,029.95 589.96
    Khulna WASA 16,603.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,603.64 195.79
    Dhaka City Corporation 162.63 1,937.07 2,633.17 4,570.24 4,732.88 55.81
    Khulna City Corporation 0.00 1,623.44 1,595.90 3,219.34 3,219.34 37.96
    Rajshahi City Corporation 0.00 1,191.18 954.31 2,145.49 2,45.49 25.30
    Chittagong City Corporation 0.00 525.45 541.75 1,067.20 1,067.20 12.58
    Mathbaria Pourashava 98.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.56 1.16
    Mymensingh Pourashava 43.05 11.35 28.91 40.26 83.31 0.98
    Gazipur Pourashava 45.08 7.67 29.00 36.67 81.75 0.96
    Jessore Pourashava 33.75 13.56 32.98 46.55 80.30 0.95
    Sirajgoni Pourashava 43.64 7.01 18.20 25.21 68.85 0.81
    Narsingdi Pourashava 18.28 5.57 15.30 20.87 39.15 0.46
    Pirojpur Pourashava 20.34 3.96 9.63 13.59 33.93 0.40
    Madaripur Pourashava 13.84 5.56 13.52 19.09 32.92 0.39
    Others 306.80 53.42 153.81 207.23 514.03 6.06
    Total 89,668.86 18,356.41 24,964.70 43,221.11 132,989.97 1,568.23

    Tk = taka, WASA = Water Supply and Sewerage Authority.

    Note: Numbers may not sum precisely because of rounding.

    Source: Ministry of Finance, Finance Division. 2019. Bangladesh Economic Review 2019. Dhaka. https://mof.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/mof.portal.gov.bd/page/e8bc0eaa_463d_4cf9_b3be_26ab70a32a47/Banglades%20Economic%20Review%202019%20Eng.zip

  • Budgetary Allocation to Local Governments

    The national budget for the local government and rural development sector was Tk378.86 billion ($4.47 billion) in fiscal year (FY) 2019 to FY2020 and increased to Tk395.73 billion ($4.67 billion) in FY2020–FY2021. An assessment of the country’s public financial management system is presented below.

    Assessment of Bangladesh’s Public Financial Management and Accountability

    In the latest assessment of the Public Financial Management System (PFMS) in Bangladesh, based on the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) framework, 2016, Bangladesh has an overall rating of D+ for the transparency of intergovernmental fiscal relations. This is based on a four-point rating scale from A (best) to D (worst). The three subindicators used to establish this overall rating include (i) transparent and rule-based systems in the horizontal allocation among subnational governments, having a rating of B; (ii) timeliness and reliability of allocations to subnational governments, having a rating of D; and (iii) extent of consolidation of fiscal data for general government according to sectoral categories, having a rating of D.

    The horizontal allocation of most transfers from the central government to subnational governments is determined by transparent, rule-based systems. Formula transfers represent over 51% of all transfers. Local governments can submit development project proposals to the Planning Commission for cofinancing by the central government. Final decisions on qualifying projects are made by the Executive Council of the National Economic Council (Planning Council).

    The Local Government Division makes the formal delivery of information regarding transfers to local governments about 2 months into the financial year, coinciding with the release of the first quarterly tranche. The Minister of Local Government makes the final decision on transfer amounts at about this time. Additional transfer decisions are made after the revised budget and may arrive in the final month of the fiscal year.

    Source: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability. 2016. Bangladesh: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability, Public Financial Management Performance Report. Dhaka. https://www.pefa.org/node/506.

    Throughout the Sixth Five-Year Plan period, the government increased its allocation for the Local Government Division from Tk80.99 billion in FY2011 to Tk144.30 billion in FY2015—an annual growth rate of 15%. The Local Government Division’s Annual Development Program disbursement rates never exceeded the allocation during the Sixth Five-Year Plan period as indicated in this below table.

    Allocation and Disbursements to the Local Government Division under the Sixth Five-Year Plan

    Year Local Government Division Annual Growth Rate of ADP Expenditures (%) Disbursement Rate (%)
    6th FYP Allocations ADP Expenditures
    $ million Tk billion $ million Tk billion
    FY2011 955.04 80.99 892.66 75.70   93.5
    FY2012 1,112.49 95.19 942.19 79.90 5.1 84.0
    FY2013 1,274.02 108.04 1,229.92 104.30 30.5 96.5
    FY2014 1,496.06 126.87 1,273.55 108.00 3.5 85.1
    FY2015 1,701.60 144.30 1,471.66 124.80 15.6 86.7

    ADP = Annual Development Program, FY = fiscal year, FYP = five-year plan, Tk = taka.

    Source: Ministry of Planning, Planning Commission, Programming Division. 2018. Local Government and Rural Development: Sector Strategy Paper. Dhaka. https://plandiv.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/plandiv.portal.gov.bd/publications/0c526c77_bb8b_42fe_99d7_f6c217986e77/LGRD-SSP.pdf.

    Allocation for the Local Government Division under the Seventh Five-Year Plan

    Ministry/Division FY2016/17 FY2017/18 FY2018/19 FY2019/20 FY2020/21
    Local Government Division (Tk billion) 166.50 20.34 24.21 28.38 33.30
    Local Government Division ($ million) 1,963.39 239.85 285.49 334.66 392.68

    FY = fiscal year, Tk =taka

    Source: Ministry of Planning, Planning Commission, Programming Division. 2018. Local Government and Rural Development: Sector Strategy Paper. Dhaka. https://plandiv.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/plandiv.portal.gov.bd/publications/0c526c77_bb8b_42fe_99d7_f6c217986e77/LGRD-SSP.pdf

  • Credit Rating of Local Governments

    No specific details related to credit ratings of local government are available.